Q4 2025 · Shipped
Foundations
Complete- Marker detection and plane anchoring
- The AR workbench with frequency and amplitude
- Phases 1 and 2 with their quizzes
- Account creation, OTP verification, progress sync
- Light and dark appearance
What is shipped,
and what is next
Published quarterly and updated when it changes. Dates on future work are intentions, not promises — the only items with hard dates are the ones already built.
Q1 2026 · Shipped
The full course
Complete- Phase 3 — face-shape mapping and feature traces
- Phase 4 — harmonics, Nyquist and noise
- Guided experiments with target matching
- Nine achievements and the certificate
- Accessibility pass to WCAG 2.2 AA
Q3 2026 · In progress
Instructor tools
Building now- Cohort dashboard — who has passed what
- Per-question analytics so weak explanations surface
- Bulk enrolment by institutional email domain
- Exportable completion records for assessment
Progress60%
Q4 2026 · Next
Shared sessions
Planned- Two or more phones on the same anchored workbench
- An instructor can drive while a class watches
- Pointer and annotation in shared space
- Session recording for students who missed it
2027 · Exploring
Author your own
Under consideration- Marker authoring with automatic quality scoring
- Custom phases built from a lesson template
- Institution-branded certificates
- A shared library of departmental modules
2027 · Exploring
Beyond signals
Under consideration- Control systems — step response in AR
- Electromagnetics — field visualisation
- Digital logic — timing diagrams on the bench
- Headset builds where the hardware is available
Prioritisation
How anything gets onto this list
Three questions, in order. If a request fails the first one it does not reach the second, no matter how often it is asked.
-
Question 1
Does it help a student understand something faster? Not “is it impressive” — the AR is already impressive and that stopped being the point in week two.
-
Question 2
Does it work on hardware students already own? Anything that requires a purchase order is a different product.
-
Question 3
Can we hold 60 fps and the privacy line? Both are load-bearing. Neither gets traded for a feature.
Asked for, and declined
Being explicit about what we are not building saves everyone time.
Leaderboards between students
Ranking a cohort publicly punishes the students the tool exists to help. Streaks and badges are private for the same reason.
Proctored, graded assessment
That would require identity verification and session monitoring — a surveillance posture incompatible with the privacy promise.
Cloud rendering of the workbench
It would let older phones run richer scenes, and it would mean streaming camera pose to a server. Not worth it.
A web version of the AR session
WebXR tracking quality is not close enough yet. The browser prototype covers evaluation; the lesson needs the native runtime.
Something missing?
Requests from teaching staff carry the most weight, especially with a concrete lesson attached.